How weird is this? Here is an example of how nutritional research can contradict itself. I found results from this study on an obscure Website called Cancer and Important Medical News. Just another argument for using moderation when taking nutritional supplements. Might there be a risk from regularly ingesting too much vitamin B and folic acid?
November 23, 2009 — Folic acid and vitamin B supplementation was associated with an increase in cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality in a new analysis with long-term follow-up of data from 2 trials conducted in Norway, where there is no folic acid fortification of foods.
The results are reported in the November 18 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association.
The authors, led by Marta Ebbing, MD, from Haukeland University Hospital in Bergen, Norway, say that these results, although in need of confirmation, suggest that there is a need for "safety monitoring" because there is now widespread folic acid fortification of foods and increasing use of folic acid in dietary supplements.
However, the authors of an accompanying editorial points out that data from the United States, where there has been mandatory folic acid fortification of flour and other foods since 1998, have been showing a significant decrease in cancer incidence. "These national incidence rates do not support a substantial population-wide adverse effect of the magnitude suggested in the study," write the editorialists, Bettina F. Drake, PhD, MPH, and Graham Colditz, MD, DrPH, both from the Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, Missouri.
"The population data from the United States do not suggest that there is a problem," Dr. Drake said in an interview with Medscape Oncology. She pointed out that folate supplementation used in the study resulted in much higher blood levels than would be seen after eating foods fortified with folic acid. In addition, the study was conducted in individuals with heart disease and was of limited duration.
The findings from this study "do not nullify the potential long-term benefits that folic acid fortification may have on population health," Dr. Drake explained. The measure was introduced to reduce neural tube defects in newborns (which arise from folate deficiency during pregnancy). A reduction was seen within a "few years," the editorialists note.
Concerns about a link between cancer and folic acid supplementation have been raised previously, most recently with regard to colorectal cancer, as reported by Medscape Oncology. At that time, leading expert on nutrition and cancer Walter Willet MD, DrPH, from the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, said: "I am certain that we are not causing an epidemic of colorectal cancer with folic acid fortification of flour." He added that there was a small increase in the incidence of this cancer soon after fortification was introduced, but this coincided with an increase in colonoscopy, and he pointed out that mortality rates from this cancer have been declining steadily.
Latest Results from Norway
The latest results come from 2 trials conducted in 6837 patients with ischemic heart disease, in which half the participants took supplements of vitamin B (including folic acid) to lower homocysteine levels to see if this would reduce cardiovascular outcomes. It did not, and these results are in line with other large trials. At the same time, both trials showed — independently — an increase in cancer in the supplementation group, compared with the placebo group, but this was not statistically significant.
In these 2 trials, participants took supplements containing folic acid (0.8 mg/d), vitamin B12 (0.4 mg/d), and B6 (40 mg/d), or various combinations of these. This dose of folic acid is 4 to 6 times higher than the average dose delivered by the mandatory fortification in the United States, and is twice the recommended daily allowance, the authors note, although they add that it is below the tolerable upper intake level of 1 mg/d set by the US Institute of Medicine.
The current analysis pooled results from the 2 trials, which had a median participation of 39 months, and added data from an observational post trial follow-up of 38 months, giving a total duration of around 5.5 years. The authors note that pooling the data from the 2 trials is "justified" because they were nearly identical.
This pooled analysis found a statistically significant increase in cancer incidence, cancer mortality, and all-cause mortality.
Feel good, keep smiling and, like me, maybe just take a little bit extra when using nutritional supplements, not gobs and gobs of mystical concentrated powders that you really know nothing about!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment